重磅干貨：公有鏈的七大挑戰及其解決方案

Hello everyone! I am Larry, founder of the Genaro Network. Thanks for the invitation from Huobi – it’s my honour to share my experience in the blockchain industry with you here. Today I’m going to talk about the 7 major challenges around public chains and their potential solutions.

大家好！ 我是Larry，Genaro Network的創始人。感謝火幣的邀請, 很榮幸能在這里與大家分享我在區塊鏈行業的經驗。今天我要談談關于公鏈的7大挑戰及其潛在解決方案。

The future as we know it will be purely sharing economy community in smart cities, where there is no middle man in business and people could trust each other. Machines like auto cars could communicate with each other efficiently and operate securely.Now we have amazing technology such as blockchain to make it happen. though they are challenges ahead, which I will go over in this talk,  I’m very excited to be in this terrain as the future looks more interconnected, amazing as ever. 

我們所預見的未來將會是在智慧城市中形成各種各樣的分享經濟社區，那里沒有中間人，人與人之間彼此信任。像汽車這樣的機器可以互相通訊，并且能夠安全運行。如今我們有區塊鏈技術來實現這一愿景。雖然前面的道路布滿荊棘，這些“荊棘”就是我接下來的演講中會涉及的一些挑戰，但能走在這條路上我仍滿心歡喜，因為未來世界一定會更加互聯互通，一定會一如既往地充滿驚喜和奇跡。

I am happy to see that so many hardworking projects are along the way to add to this ecosystem, and ultimately we hope technology could penetrate the market in a scaling manner.  

我很高興地看到，許多腳踏實地的項目正在為建設這個生態系統做出貢獻，最終我們希望技術能以一種逐步擴展的方式進入市場。

I want us to keep in mind that the best tech innovations must meet market demands and have vehicles of use. For instance, Bitcoin now run into some bottle neck issues such as the tps is too slow. But when it came out created the peer to peer financial system for us, this was extremely valuable, met the market needs in 2009 and worked pretty well in following years. Now we have more market demands, and Developers also need to continuously hacked away at the tech to try to speedup or solve these issues. 

我希望大家記住的是，最好的技術創新一定要滿足市場需求并且要有使用的工具。比如，比特幣現在遇到了瓶頸問題，如TPS太慢。但它為我們創建了點對點金融系統，僅僅這一點就功不可沒，在2009年它滿足了市場需求，并且隨后的幾年中運行良好。現在更多的市場需求出現了，而開發人員也需要不斷地突破技術以加速現有問題的解決。

So, what are some of the main challenges around the publicchain technologies we see today…as we are working on Genaro Network， we face these current issues and potential solutions also we have proposed our own solutions.

那么，我們今天看到的公鏈技術所面臨的一些主要挑戰是什么呢?這些也正是我們開發Genaro Network時面臨著的實際問題。我們為這些問題提出了一些自己的解決方案。

Let’s start with the first challenge: “how to design a sustainable consensus mechanism”. The most popular consensus is proof of work. Because in a Nakamoto consensus blockchain system, the longest chain is the only correct chain, to avoid attackers forking and extending the forked chain too easily, miners have to contribute enough computing power by solving math puzzles to put the blocks they have discovered onto the chain. But this causes serious energy waste: in 2017, the electricity used in bitcoin mining cost is over that of 159 countries. Additionally, the cost is not going toward useful computation – it's not computation of genetic engineering nor artificial intelligence, which would be useful in the real world, it's just using computation for solving random math puzzles. 

公鏈的第一個挑戰是“如何設計可持續的共識機制”。最普遍的共識是工作證明（PoW）。因為在中本聰共識協議的區塊鏈系統中，最長的鏈是唯一正確的鏈，為了避免攻擊者太過容易地分叉并且拓展分叉鏈，礦工必須通過解決數學難題來將他們發現的塊放入鏈中以貢獻足夠的計算能力。但這會造成嚴重的能源浪費：2017年，比特幣采礦成本所用的電力超過了159個國家的用電量。此外，該成本并沒有轉向有用的計算 – 不是計算基因工程或人工智能這些在現實世界中很有用的問題，而是計算隨機的沒有意義的數學難題。

To avoid this issue, people start to support PoS: proof of stake. It allows miners to extend the blockchain by staking their token without any computation power. However, pure PoS will introduce security issues, such as the “long range attack” and “nothing at stake”; this is because anyone can extend the blockchain only if he has enough tokens, so the chain is easier to be forked.

為了避免這個問題，人們開始支持PoS：權益證明。它允許礦工通過押注來擴展區塊鏈而無需任何算力。然而，單純的PoS會引來安全問題，例如“遠程攻擊”和“無利害關系”; 這是因為任何人只要有足夠的通證都可以擴展區塊鏈，因此鏈條更容易分叉。

So we need to design a sustainable consensus mechanism, to find some useful computation to secure the PoS

所以我們需要設計一個可持續的共識機制，找到一些有用的計算來保證PoS的安全性。

The second challenge is how to establish a peer to peer sharing network.

第二個挑戰是如何建立點對點的共享網絡。

Bitcoin was invented to create a pure peer to peer system, and so were most public chains. In such a system, all nodes have to have the right or ability to share something to earn rewards.  Otherwise they would only become consumers. It’s like in any community, anyone has to earn resources in order to survive here.

比特幣是為了創建一個單純的點對點系統而發明的，大多數公鏈都是如此。 在這樣的系統中，所有節點必須有權利或能夠分享某些東西來獲得獎勵。 否則，他們只能成為消費者。 這就像在任何一個社區里，任何人都必須獲取資源才能生存一樣。

Personally I haven’t mined bitcoin, because back in 2015 when I first started working on blockchain, my laptop could hardly mine any bitcoin. I have mined Ethereum, but only for about half a year. Then it became impossible as well. This is because computation power has a monopoly effect  – if you are a big mining factory and I am a laptop, I am not going to earn any reward because the task takes you 1 minute to finish and takes me 1 hour, you take away the reward while I am just getting started.  This also happens more thanks to the revving up of the “arms race”in mining industry, whereby people are always busy with creating more advanced mining machines.

就我個人而言，我沒有挖過比特幣，因為在2015年我第一次開始研究區塊鏈時，我的筆記本電腦已經幾乎挖不出任何比特幣了。我以前挖過以太坊，但也只持續了大概半年時間。后來，這也都變得不可能了。這是因為算力的壟斷效應 - 如果你是一家大型礦廠，而我只是一臺筆記本電腦，我將不會獲得任何獎勵，因為你花1分鐘完成的任務，我需要1個小時，你拿走獎勵的時候，我才剛剛開始。這種情況越來越多地發生還因為挖礦的“軍備競賽”，人們總是忙于創造更先進的采礦機器。

To solve this problem, people start to think of sharing more things instead of computation power, such as storage. There are certain products that work well, such as Storj, ipfs, sia, and Genaro sharer, launched by the Genaro team. However, purely sharing storage and getting the reward from whoever uses the storage without any system-based reward, this cannot satisfy the sharers – they expect much more. For example, bitcoin mining also comes from system rewards, instead of purely from transaction fees. This cannot last forever. We need to find out a fair business model – this means we need to think about what else users could share to earn reward.

為了解決這個問題，人們開始考慮共享更多的東西，而不是算力，比如存儲。有些產品運行良好，例如Storj，ipfs，sia和由Genaro團隊開發的Genaro Sharer。但純粹共享存儲空間并從使用存儲的人那里獲得獎勵，但沒有任何系統獎勵的話，無法滿足分享者們的期望——他們想要的遠遠不止這些。 例如，比特幣采礦也來自系統獎勵，而不是僅僅來自交易費。這不是長遠之計。我們需要找出一個公平的商業模式 - 這意味著我們需要考慮還有哪些用戶可以分享的東西以獲得獎勵。

The third challenge is: how to increase blockchain transactions per second, as is known as TPS. This was one of the hottest topics over the past year and still is. Many projects are working on it in different ways. Basically:

TPS = concurrency divided by average response time.

第三個挑戰是：如何增加每秒的區塊鏈交易，即所謂的TPS。這是過去一年中最熱門的話題之一，現在依然如此。許多項目正在以不同的方式開展工作。TPS =并發數除以平均響應時間。

So naturally，projects such as Zilliqa, Ethereum apply sharding techniques to blockchain to increase the concurrency.

因此很自然的想法，例如Zilliqa，Ethereum等項目將分片（sharding）技術應用于區塊鏈以提高并發數。

In a blockchain system，TPS also equals to the amount of transactions in one block divided by the time of generating one block. So bitcoin could increase TPS by increasing block size, so there could be more transactions in one block. On the other hand, EOS uses DPoS techniques to decrease the time of generating one block. Only 21 master nodes reaching consensus takes a much shorter time than reaching consensus by all nodes. Some projects try to jump out the box – they put certain transactions outside blockchain. This is called an“off-chain” solution, examples being the Raiden network or lightning network. It's like, if you run a coffee shop, all transactions happen inside your coffee shop, buy a cup of cappuccino, or something, only comes to you, then you clearing with the global financial system at last.

在一個區塊鏈系統中，TPS也等于一個塊中的事務數量除以生成一個塊的時間。所以比特幣可以通過增加塊的大小來增加TPS，因此在一個塊中可能會有更多的交易。 另一方面，EOS使用DPoS技術來減少產生一個塊的時間。21個達成共識的主節點花費的時間要比所有節點達成共識的時間短得多。有些項目試圖另辟蹊徑 - 他們把某些交易放在區塊鏈之外進行。這被稱為鏈下解決方案，例如Raiden網絡或閃電網絡。簡單來講就是，如果你經營一家咖啡店，所有的交易都發生在你的咖啡店里，買一杯卡布奇諾或者其他什么，只跟你結算，最后你會跟全球的金融系統來結算。

All these projects are great innovations, but most of them try to increase efficiency by sacrificing security and decentralization too much. There is no way to break the trilemma. But we also need to think about the how to maintain security and decentralization level to meet market need, or how to establish secure and trusted system in other ways.

所有這些項目都是偉大的創新，但是他們大多數都是通過犧牲安全性與去中心化程度來實現增加效率的。三角限制自然不能打破，但我們依然需要去思考如何維持一個符合市場需求的安全與去中心化程度的水平，或者說用其他方法建造安全與可信的系統。

The fourth challenge is "how to store DAPPs’ data securely in a decentralized way". Most DAPPs today are still using cloud servers such as amazon cloud. Blockchain is not designed to store data because no node could store all data comes from all Dapps. That's why Ethereum swarm is so limited. There are some projects working on decentralized storage, such as ipfs, Storj and of course Genaro Eden. Unfortunately, most the decentralized storage is isolated from the public chain. It’s like your CPU and hard drive are separated.

第四個挑戰是“如何以去中心化的方式安全地存儲DAPP數據”。今天大多數DAPP仍在使用云服務器，如亞馬遜云。區塊鏈不用于存儲數據，因為沒有節點可以存儲來自所有DAPP的所有數據。這就是為什么Ethereum Swarm如此有限。有一些項目正在研究去中心化存儲，如ipfs，storj，當然還有Genaro Eden。不幸的是，大多數點對點存儲是與公鏈相隔離的。這就好比你的CPU和硬盤是分開的。

The fifth is “how to establish data channels between blockchains and the real world”. Currently the blockchain and the real world are isolated because of the trickiness of pulling data from outside. When miners run smart contracts on virtual machine, it is not possible to grab the exact same data at the same time. Let’s say there is a Dapp arranging my travel to Vietnam here, when help me book the flight, the ticket price varies on different website, some miner may go to expedia while some may go to skyscanner.

第五個是“如何建立區塊鏈和現實世界之間的數據通道”。目前區塊鏈和現實世界是孤立的，因為有從外部拉取數據的難度。當礦工在虛擬機上運行智能合約時，不可能同時獲取完全相同的數據。假設有一個DAPP將我的旅行安排在越南，幫助我預訂航班，不同網站上的票價會有所不同，有些礦工可能會去expedia，有些可能會去skyscanner。

Current solution is to make a prediction market work as an oracle machine, and push data to the blockchain, this includes projects like Augur, Gnosis etc. however, the way this market works is whichever data has the highest stake, is regarded as correct. The logic is that those who bet more will try harder to get the right data. Obviously, they are all good Dapps, but is not enough to work as oracle machine.

目前的解決方案是使預測市場成為一個預言機，并將數據推送到區塊鏈，這包括諸如Augur，Gnosis等項目。然而，這個市場運作的方式是，無論哪個數據有最高的stake，就被認為是正確的。運行的邏輯是那些下注越多的人會更努力獲得正確的數據。很明顯，它們都是很好的DAPP，但不足以好到像預言機那樣工作。

The sixth hard problem is how to design a sustainable token model. For instance, the transaction fees are too high. If you buy a coffee with bitcoin, the transaction fee might be higher than the coffee itself. This leads to the bitcoin’s value becoming negative if we apply purchasing power parity to estimate bitcoin. Also most public chains are relying on the mining or forging model too much. But think about where the system reward comes from? It actually from who join the system later. Finally, a utility token could be used for a product or service. This may be the most promising innovation in the fintech area, however this also cause the service price fluctuates too much.

第六個難題是如何設計一個可持續的通證模型。例如，交易費用太高。 如果你用比特幣買咖啡，交易費可能會高于咖啡本身。如果我們用購買力平價來估計比特幣，這可能導致比特幣的價值變為負值。另外，大多數公鏈都過度依賴挖礦或創造模型。但想想系統獎勵是從哪里來的？ 它實際上是系統后來的加入者帶來的。最后，實用通證可以用于產品或服務。這可能是金融科技領域最有前景的創新，但這也導致服務價格波動過大。

People are thinking other kind of solutions such as DAG, which has no transaction fee. Also there are stable token like Dai and Tether. Just note that token model is still at very early stage that most problems are open problems that there is not a single solution could solve all those problems.

人們開始想其他形式的解決方案，例如DAG, 沒有手續費。同時也有穩定通證，例如Dai和Tether。需要注意的是通證模型的設計還在非常早期的階段，大多數問題都是開放問題，沒有一個解決方案可以解決全部問題。

Lastly, how to specify blockchain governance?

最后，如何具體描述區塊鏈治理？

Reaching consensus for a single block is easy, but for the whole project’s direction it is extremely hard. In traditional structures such as a company, we organize individuals by department and reward by salary. management groups discuss important things, and the board of directors has the most power to decide things. However, blockchain is governed in a decentralized way, we need to organize each kind of community member well by fair incentive.

達成一個區塊的共識很容易，但對于整個項目的方向來說，這是非常困難的。 在像公司這樣的傳統結構中，我們按部門組織人員，然后管理團隊討論重要的事情，董事會決定事情的權力最大。然而，區塊鏈是以去中心化的方式進行管理的。

For instance, bitcoin uses BIP signal system; when someone wants something, he or she just writes the information in block and there is no guarantee this suggestion is listened and adapted or not – the bitcoin core team still needs lot of off line discussion and can hardly reach other miners and token holders.

例如，比特幣使用BIP信號系統; 當有人想要某些東西時，他或她只是將信息寫入區塊，并不能保證這個建議是被聽取和采用的 - 比特幣核心團隊仍然需要大量的離線討論，并且很難接觸到其他礦工和通證持有者。

EOS tries to solve this problem by voting. Setting aside the whole problem of bribery during elections, its logic is "whoever has the power to attract most votes has the ability to guard the chain ." We think there might be a better logic to solve this problem.

EOS試圖通過投票解決這個問題。拋開選舉期間的所有賄賂問題，其邏輯是“誰有能力吸引大多數選票就有能力保護鏈”。我們認為可能有更好的解決該問題的邏輯。

Blockchain technology has been developing for decades and all the mentioned projects are great innovations. However, this industry develops so fast that technology iterates fast as well. When everyone tries to add padding to current blockchains such as Ethereum, we think, why not make a new thing and try to solve the issues at the first time designing the system? like it is said “the best way to improve a carriage is to make a car.”

區塊鏈技術已經發展了數十年，所有上面提到的項目都是偉大的創新。但是，這個行業發展得如此之快，以至于技術的迭代速度也很快。當每個人都試圖向當前的區塊鏈系統，例如在以太坊上打補丁時，我們覺得，為什么不做一個新的東西，在設計之初就試圖解決這些問題？正如一句古話 “改進馬車的最好方法是發明汽車”。

So, what is Genaro?

所以Genaro是什么？

In one sentence, The Genaro Network is the first Turing-complete public blockchain combining peer-to-peer storage with a sustainable consensus mechanism. Genaro's mixed consensus uses SPoR (Sentinel Proof of Retrievability) and PoS (Proof of Stake), ensuring stronger performance and security.

Genaro Network是第一個結合點對點存儲和可持續共識機制的圖靈完備公有鏈。 Genaro的混合共識機制使用SPoR（Sentinel Proof of Retrievability）和PoS（權證證明），確保更強大的性能和安全性。

Genaro provides developers with a one-stop platform to deploy smart contracts and store the data needed by Dapps at the same time. This will provide everyone with a trusted Internet that connects the real world to the blockchain securely.

Genaro為開發人員提供一站式平臺來部署智能合約并同時存儲dApp所需的數據。這將為每個人提供一個值得信賴的互聯網，可以安全地將現實世界與區塊鏈連接起來。

Then… why it is a car? Why combine storage and a public chain can solve these problems? How to combine them?

那么，為什么說它是能“替代馬車的汽車”呢？為什么結合存儲和公鏈可以解決這些問題？以及如何結合兩者呢？

Ok…let's go deeper and figure out all the whys.

好，那我們就更深入地分析下這些“為什么”。

First, a sustainable consensus mechanism: SPoR +PoS

首先，一個可持續的共識機制：SPoR+PoS

SPoR is short for sentinel proof of retrievability – it is a calculation to tell you your file could be retrieved from servers if you want. Sentinel is the hash of a random piece of your data, and stored on the blockchain. It is low energy consumption, and will not increase over time like bitcoin. More importantly, it is a useful type of computation, used in cloud storage for years. Lastly, the Genaro network uses SPoR to secure PoS to prevent attack – nobody can easily fork and extend the forked chain because you did not run SPoR algorithm and do not have previous sentinels.

SPoR是“Sentinel Proof of Retrievability”（數據的可檢索性證明）的縮寫 - 這是一個計算，告訴你如果你愿意，你的文件可以從服務器上檢索。 Sentinel(哨兵)是你的數據隨機一部分的哈希，并且存儲在區塊鏈中。這是低能耗的，更不會像比特幣一樣隨著時間的增加使能耗增加。更重要的是，它是一種有用的計算，已經多年被用于云存儲。最后，Genaro網絡使用SPoR來確保PoS以防止攻擊 - 沒有人可以輕松地分叉和擴展分叉鏈，因為你沒有運行過SPoR算法并且沒有之前的哨兵。

Second, Genaro sharer, is a peer to peer sharing network with more incentives. As for the basic level, increase in computing power or large node storage space cannot have a ‘monopoly-effect‘. As for deep level, we think the most precious resource nowadays is data. Genaro sharer’s ultimate goal was to allow both individuals and company to share data based on the storage network. For instance, a Company could run machine learning on the encrypted data on Genaro Eden, and data sharer could get rewards through smart contract on Genaro Network.

其次，Genaro Sharer是一個具有更多激勵的點對點共享網絡。對于基礎級別，算力或大型節點存儲空間的增加不會產生“壟斷效應”。至于深層次的級別，我們認為當今最寶貴的資源就是數據。 Genaro Sharer的最終目標是讓個人和公司共享基于存儲網絡的數據。例如，公司可以對Genaro Eden上的加密過數據運行機器學習程序，數據共享者可以通過Genaro網絡上的智能合約獲得獎勵。

Third, why does Genaro have higher TPS? Also how does SPoR + PoS work?

第三，為什么Genaro的TPS更高？ 另外SPoR + PoS如何工作？

To reach a consensus, step one, all nodes need to stake token and get the right to share storage. Then the SPoR filters out the governance nodes from the storage nodes. That is to say, less than 200 trusted nodes reach a consensus, which is faster than all nodes consensus, and the blocks are continuously produced to reduce verification time.

想要達成共識，第一步，所有節點都需要進行stake并獲得共享存儲的權利。然后，SPoR從存儲節點中篩選出治理節點。也就是說，少于200個可信節點達成共識，這比達成所有節點的共識要快，并且這些區塊連續產生以減少驗證時間。

Fourth, Genaro Eden is a peer-to-peer storage network deeply coupled with public chain. All data is stored in a decentralized way on Genaro Eden, and the sentinels’ related info will be stored on chain and synced. Then the Genaro virtual machine operates from the instruction level on this network, therefore to provide a one-stop solution for deploying smart contract and store data at the same time.

第四，Genaro Eden是一個與公有鏈深度耦合的點對點存儲網絡。 所有數據都以去中心化的方式存儲在Genaro Eden上，"哨兵”的相關信息將存儲在鏈上并進行同步。 然后，Genaro虛擬機將從該網絡的指令級開始運行，從而為同時部署智能合約和存儲數據提供一站式解決方案。

Fifth, we have designed a protocol called “GSIOP“ to establish data channels between blockchains and the real world. Gsiop is short for Genaro streaming IO protocol. Data is initiated in GSIOP and stored in Genaro Eden. The keys for encrypted KV pairs are stored on chain as "pointer" to the decentralized data. Also the Dapp's owner has to define the rules of data operation. when someone wants to update the data, he or she has to follow the rules in an encrypted way through Gsiop as well. The updated data is stored in the Genaro storage network and this updated transaction is recorded on blockchain, it's like a handle to help developer to find the data on storage network.in this way, the blockchain will always know where to grab the correct data for applications.

第五，我們設計了一個名為“GSIOP”的協議來建立區塊鏈和真實世界之間的數據通道。 GSIOP是Genaro Streaming IO Protocol的縮寫。數據在GSIOP中啟動并存儲在Genaro Eden中。加密KV對的密鑰存儲在鏈上作為分散數據的“指針”。此外，DAPP的所有者必須定義數據操作的規則。當有人想更新數據時，他們必須以加密方式遵循規則并通過GSIOP。更新后的數據存儲在Genaro存儲網絡中，并且這一更新的交易也被記錄在區塊鏈中，這就像一個幫助開發人員查找存儲網絡上的數據的把手一樣。通過這種方式，區塊鏈將始終知道在哪里獲取其應用所需的正確數據。

As for the Sixth challenge, Genaro uses two layers of gas to make the token model more sustainable. Storage gas is more expensive than normal transaction gas because it uses more resources in the system. We are also designing a new payment gateway uses fiat money to use all produce features in the Genaro ecosystem, to provide users an additional option.

至于第六項挑戰，Genaro使用雙重gas模型使通證模型更具可持續性。儲存gas比正常的交易gas更昂貴，因為它在系統中使用更多的資源。我們還在設計一個新的支付網關，通過法幣來使用Genaro生態系統中的所有產品功能，為用戶提供額外的選擇。

The last challenge is blockchain governance. First we think on-chain governance is absolutely needed to create the decentralized community. We kindly support the idea of a“master node”– however, the master nodes should not come from voting, otherwise it’s like “whoever has the ability to attract more votes, is most trusted and helpful to the entire system”,  this logic is not perfect. So we use ranking instead of voting to select the “master nodes”. As for the ranking function, we use two factors: the GNX the node is staking and the amount of sentinels the node contains. Staking is easy to understand, it is there to make sure the master node has common interest with the system. As for sentinel, it’s like when others store data on your node, that’s your sentinel amount plus one, so the more sentinel you have, more contribution you have made to the entire storage network. So Genaro’s logic is “whoever has the most significant contribution to the system, is most trusted and helpful to the entire system”. We believe data is the most valuable thing in the Genaro network, and sentinel refers to data value as well, so we call it “data governance”.

最后一個挑戰是區塊鏈治理。首先，我們認為建立分權化社區絕對需要鏈上治理。我們支持“主 節點”的想法 - 但是，主節點不應該來自投票，否則就像“誰能夠吸引更多的選票，誰就是最值得信賴的并且對整個系統有幫助的人”，顯然這個邏輯是不盡完善的。所以我們使用排名而不是投票來選擇“主節點”。至于排名函數，我們使用兩個因素：節點的GNX權益證明和節點包含的"哨兵”數量。權益證明很容易理解，它確保主節點對系統有共同的利益。至于"哨兵”，就像其他人在你的節點上存儲數據時一樣，這就是你的"哨兵”數量加1，因此擁有的"哨兵”越多，對整個存儲網絡的貢獻就越多。因此，Genaro的邏輯是“對系統有最重要貢獻的人，就是整個系統最值得信賴和對系統有幫助的人”。我們認為數據是Genaro網絡中最有價值的東西，而"哨兵”也對應的是數據價值，所以我們稱之為“數據治理”。

That’s all! To sum up, Genaro is the first Turing- complete public chain with a Peer-to-peer storage network. Hope you guys enjoyed that! Do let me know if you have any questions!

這就是全部啦！ 總而言之，Genaro是第一個擁有點對點存儲網絡的圖靈完備共有鏈。希望你們喜歡！ 如果有任何感興趣的問題，請告訴我！